ITEM:# R10671
STONE 1:
WEIGHT: 1.56ct
QUANTITY: 1
TYPE: Lab Grown Diamond
SHAPE: Round Brilliant
COLOR: D
CLARITY: VS1
MEASUREMENTS: 7.51 - 7.46 x 4.53 mm
TOTAL DEPTH: 60.3%
TABLE SIZE: 59%
POLISH: EX
SYMMETRY: EX
FLUORESCENCE: NONE
IGI REPORT #: LG636407960
STONE 2:
WEIGHT: 1.56ct
QUANTITY: 1
TYPE: Lab Grown Diamond
SHAPE: Round Brilliant
COLOR: D
CLARITY: VS1
MEASUREMENTS: 7.49 - 7.47 x 4.54 mm
TOTAL DEPTH: 60.6%
TABLE SIZE: 59%
POLISH: EX
SYMMETRY: EX
FLUORESCENCE: NONE
IGI REPORT #: LG627465680
MOUNTING: 18Karat White Gold
The term "Ideal Cut" gets thrown around all over the place. I'm sure I've done it referring to a round diamond once or twice.
Both these diamonds are classified as "Ideal" on the IGI reports.
My opinion is that the term is widely abused.
Are these diamonds super well cut? Indeed they are! Are they "Super Ideal"? No, they're not - we have those too - and they are much more costly.
You're getting over 3 carats of carefully vetted well cut, colorless, VS Diamonds.
Carefully set into heavy duty 18kt white gold stud mountings.
They rock.
